2011年5月8日 星期日

人怎麼建構 認識的世界---萬法唯識

眼見真的可以為憑嗎?感官和實際的物品其實是有差距的,人類的大腦因為過往累積的經驗,而產生視覺的錯覺。
Beau Lotto: Optical illusions show how we see影片來源:TED.COM
這是有趣的演講   
以下是一個觀眾的回應   
Apr 27 2011: Do you think sight is a miracle? 


Beau Lotto’s talk is interesting, engaging, and just plain cool. He shows his passion for science and art in his on-stage demonstrations. He must be an expert in his field and must really love this job.
He starts his amazing presentation with an optical illusion, and there are plenty more throughout the video. His presentations is focused on sight, color, and the relationships between the two. His presentations slowly builds on the fact that sight is a miracle. Sight itself is interesting enough, but understanding that information, those specks of light that should mean nothing, is phenomenal. In one example, he shows the silhouette of two shapes. They look exactly the same, but after revealing the background, he shows that these two shapes came from very different places. Beau’s research is extensive and shows how passionate he is about his work.
This talk left me with a few questions. I wondered how our eyes could view a rotating object as rotating in both directions at once, and why humans rely on sight more than any other sense. If his talk has taught me anything, it’s this this: you can’t always believe what you see
我貼出此篇並不只是把它當做新鮮好玩的影片而已
而是認為從這個演講所做的研究  可以做為一個佛教唯識學的思考題.

3 則留言:

台語與佛典 提到...

This movie is amazing.
By the way, 我問的俱舍論問題是:
(名身、句身、文身(字身))

KWANGCHING 提到...
作者已經移除這則留言。
KWANGCHING 提到...

根據我的瞭解(有很高的正確性)
名句文身
用現代的概念解釋
相當於語音學 語意學 和文法學

就是這一個音 (這一串音)聲
我們能夠產生如此的瞭解 如此解讀
是因為有名 句 文 身 (三種)實體
才會讓我們 對這一(串)聲音 做這樣的瞭解
身是KAYA 是一種聚集
您提到的『字』在論中的解釋應該是一個音節(Syllable)